Coagulation Factors for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection / 中山大学学报(医学科学版)

ObjectivePeriprosthetic joint infections （PJI） are currently the most calamitous complication after arthroplasty. Although achievements have been made in many markers for the diagnosis of PJI， the lack of a gold standard remains a great obstacle for early diagnosis. This study aimed to investigate the association between coagulation markers and the development of PJI in patients undergoing revision total joint arthroplasty （TJA）. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study with a total of 2 517 patients who underwent hip or knee arthroplasties from January 2011 to January 2022 （2 394 with primary TJA， 87 with aseptic revision and 36 with PJI）. We applied univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression to analyze differences of coagulation factors between primary TJA and aseptic revision or PJI group. Receiver operating characteristic （ROC） curve and area under the curve （AUC） were used to measure the diagnostic value of coagulation factors in predicting PJI. ResultsCoagulation factors and their ratios including plasma fibrinogen （FBG）， prothrombin time （PT）， thrombin time （TT）， activated partial thromboplastin time （APTT）， platelet （PLT）， mean platelet volume （MPV）， platelet distribution width （PDW）， plateletcrit （PCT）， PLT / MPV， PLT / PDW and PLT / PCT were included in this study. High FGB level was strongly correlated with the risk of PJI compared to other coagulation factors. The optimal threshold value of FBG was 4.53 g/L with a sensitivity of 47.22%， a specificity of 93.07% （Primary TJA group vs. PJI group）. Similarly， the optimal threshold value of FBG was 4.44 g/L with a sensitivity of 47.22%， a specificity of 95.40% between the other two groups （Aseptic revision group vs. PJI group）. ROC curve analysis demonstrated moderate diagnostic performance of FBG （AUC value）， indicating a potential to be a diagnostic marker for PJI. ConclusionsFBG is significantly correlated with PJI and it can be used as a potential non-invasive marker for early detection. It may serve as a safe and cost-effective tool for assessing PJI in clinical work.

Debridement， Antibiotics and Implant Retention for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Arthroplasty： A Narrative Review / 中山大学学报(医学科学版)

Periprosthetic joint infection （PJI） following joint arthroplasty is devastating and technique-demanding. At present， the surgical treatment for PJI includes debridement， antibiotics， and implant retention （DAIR）， single- or two-stage revision， arthrodesis， and amputation. DAIR is appealing to both surgeons and patients as it can avoid unnecessary implants removal， making it less time-consuming and less invasive. In this article， we review the current knowledge in surgical timing， intraoperative details and antibiotics strategy of DAIR.

Serum Procalcitonin Guide in a Case of Proteus mirabilis Prosthetic Joint Infection

@#Infection is a dreaded complication in patients who have underwent arthroplasty and often very challenging to treat. It accounts for lesser than 1% of arthroplasty cases and although low in occurrence, requires appropriate investigations and management to successfully treat the condition. This case demonstrates a case of a rare microorganism with unusual antibiotic susceptibility causing a prosthetic joint infection and the use of serum procalcitonin level as guide in management of the patient.

Clinical characteristics of 225 patients with bone and joint infection / 中华传染病杂志

Objective:To analyze the clinical characteristics and pathogen distributions of the patients with bone and joint infection.Methods:The clinical data and etiological results of 225 patients with bone and joint infection from January 2008 to October 2020 in Huashan Hospital, Fudan University were retrospectively analyzed.Statistical analysis was conducted by chi-square test.Results:Of the 225 cases with bone and joint infection, 75.6%(170/225) were extremities and other osteomyelitis, 16.0%(36/225) were suppurative arthritis, 8.4%(19/225) were spinal osteomyelitis. Non-implants related infection accounted for 80.4%(181/225) of the cases, while 19.6%(44/225) of the cases were implants related infection. The main clinical manifestations were localized pain (48.4%(109/225)), dyskinesia (47.6%(107/225)), localized swelling (28.9%(65/225)), fever (28.0%(63/225)), and increased purulent exudation (24.9%(56/225)). The proportions of localized pain (55.8%(101/181)) and fever (31.5%(57/181)) of non-implants infection were higher than those of implants infection (18.2%(8/44) and 13.6%(6/44), respectively), while the proportion of increased purulent exudation in implants infection (50.0%(22/44)) was higher than that in non-implants infection (18.8%(34/181)). There were all significant differences between the two groups ( χ2=15.49, 5.60 and 18.45, respectively, all P<0.050). Of the 225 cases, 63 cases(28.0%) had complications with other site infection, especially soft tissue infection and bloodstream infection. A total of 106 strains of pathogens were isolated from 225 specimens, 58.5%(62/106) of them were Gram positive bacterium.Among them, 34.0%(36/106) were Staphylococcus aureus, with the rate of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolation accounting for 11.3%(12/106). Laboratory tests showed that 40.4%(91/225) of the patients had elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), 32.9%(74/225) patients had elevated C-reactive protein (CRP). Proportions of patients with elevated ESR (43.6%(79/181)) and CRP (37.6%(68/181)) in non-implants infection were significantly higher than those in implants infection (27.3%(12/44) and 13.6%(6/44), respectively). There were significant differences between the two groups ( χ2=3.94 and 9.19, respectively, P=0.047 and 0.002, respectively). Conclusions:The main clinical manifestations of bone and joint infection are localized pain, dyskinesia, localized swelling, fever and increased purulent exudation. Patients with bone and joint infection are easy to be complicated with soft tissue infection and bloodstream infection, and often accompanied by increased ESR and CRP levels. Gram positive bacterium are the main pathogens.

Complementary Medicine a Costly Risk in Management of Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis? A Case Report

@#Knee osteoarthritis is the commonest cause of knee pain in the elderly. It is characterized by unresolved pain, limitation of motion and reduced quality of life. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a safe and effective method in treating chronic knee osteoarthritis. We report a rare case of a seventy-seven-year-old Chinese female with multiple comorbidities and bilateral degenerative osteoarthritis who had sought services of traditional and complementary medicine (TCM) for pain relief. The patient experienced unresolved pain and superficial skin scars following the unregulated procedure. This paper aims to outline the importance of awareness among surgeons regarding the unregulated practice of TCM that may exacerbate chronic osteoarthritis, joint synovitis, influence the surgical approach for future procedures with the presence of scars and prosthetic joint infection risk.

A Multi-Disciplinary Approach for the Management of Prosthetic Joint Infections: An Australian Perspective

@#Introduction: Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are a major complication of hip and knee arthroplasty, imposing significant morbidity and mortality. Orthopaedic oncology units have utilised a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) approach for some time. PJI is not only an equally lifethreatening condition, it also requires input from multiple healthcare personnel and treatment can vary significantly between individuals given the diversity in microbiological, surgical and host factors. Our arthroplasty service established an MDT meeting to manage this complex patient group. This study describes the philosophy and implementation of an MDT approach to the management of PJIs at a tertiary hospital in Australia. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all patients that presented to the MDT PJI meeting from October 2017 to April 2020 was performed. Patient characteristics, microbiological profile and management were reviewed. Results: One hundred and one patients were reviewed over 2.5 years with a mean age of 69.2 years (SD 11.9). Patients presenting predominantly had a primary TKR (32%) or primary THR (22%). Results of Microbiology cultures varied, with 42% Gram-positive organisms, 13% Gramnegative organisms, 2% fungus and 1% yeast origin. Management mainly consisted of two-stage revision (28%), debridement-antibiotics-and-implant retention (22%) and antibiotic suppression (14%). A total of 91.5% of patients who underwent surgical management were considered cured at one year. Conclusion: PJIs are complex and require coordinated care by a number of healthcare personnel. The MDT process has allowed collaboration between Orthopaedic, Infectious Disease and Microbiology departments and aims to improve the quality of care provided to patients, potentially reducing morbidity and mortality of patients with PJI.

Fungal periprosthetic joint infection: Rare but challenging problem / 中华创伤杂志(英文版)

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most difficult complication following total joint arthroplasty. Most of the etiological strains, accounting for over 98% of PJI, are bacterial species, with Staphylococcusaureus and Coagulase-negative staphylococci present in between 50% and 60% of all PJIs. Fungi, though rare, can also cause PJI in 1%-2% of cases and can be challenging to manage. The management of this uncommon but complex condition is challenging due to the absence of a consistent algorithm. Diagnosis of fungal PJI is difficult as isolation of the organisms by traditional culture may take a long time, and some of the culture-negative PJI can be caused by fungal organisms. In recent years, the introduction of next-generation sequencing has provided opportunity for isolation of the infective organisms in culture-negative PJI cases. The suggested treatment is based on consensus and includes operative and non-operative measures. Two-stage revision surgery is the most reliable surgical option for chronic PJI caused by fungi. Pharmacological therapy with antifungal agents is required for a long period of time with antibiotics and included to cover superinfections with bacterial species. The aim of this review article is to report the most up-to-date information on the diagnosis and treatment of fungal PJI with the intention of providing clear guidance to clinicians, researchers and surgeons.

Three phase bone scintigraphy in diagnosis of periprosthetic artificial joint infection / 中国医学影像技术

Objective: To explore the value of three phase bone scintigraphy (TPBS) in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after artificial joint replacement (AJR). Methods: TPBS data of 236 patients with 324 joints after AJR were retrospectively analyzed, including 120 joints (48 hips, 72 knees) in PJI group, 119 joints (75 hips, 44 knees) in aseptic loosening group and 85 joints (28 hips, 57 knees) in control group. The uptake of imaging agent around prosthesis was analyzed with visual and semi-quantitative methods. The diagnostic values of different visual judgment criteria for PJI were evaluated according to final clinical diagnosis, and blood pool phases were compared among different groups with semi-quantitative analysis to obtain the best diagnostic threshold and evaluate the diagnostic efficiency. Results: The accuracy rate of abnormal uptake in diagnosis of hip joint infection was higher than that of knee joint infection (92.68% vs 65.51%, P0.05). TBR of knee joint in PJI group was higher than that in aseptic loosening group and control group (both P<0.001), and in aseptic loosening group was higher than in control group (P<0.001). Taken TBR≥1.44 as the threshold, the diagnostic accuracy for PJI of knee joint was 91.38%. Conclusion: TPBS could be used to diagnose PJI after AJR. The visual judgment of TPBS had high accuracy in diagnosis of hip prosthesis infection, whereas combining with semi-quantitative analysis was necessary for judging knee prosthesis infection.

Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection is not Inferior to Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

@#Introduction: This study aims to investigate whether patients undergoing two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and one-stage revision THA for aseptic reasons have similar clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction during their post-operative follow-up. We hypothesise that the two-stage revision THA for PJI is associated with poorer outcomes as compared to aseptic revision THA. Materials and Methods: We reviewed prospectively collected data in our tertiary hospital arthroplasty registry and identified patients who underwent revision THA between 2001 and 2014, with a minimum of two years follow-up. The study group (two-stage revision THA for PJI) consists of 23 patients and the control group (one-stage revision THA for aseptic reasons) consists of 231 patients. Patient demographics, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores and patient reported satisfaction were evaluated. Student’s t-test was used to compare continuous variables between the two groups. Statistical significance was defined as p <0.05. Results: The pre-operative demographics and clinical scores were relatively similar between the two groups of patients. At two years, patients who underwent revision THA for PJI reported a better WOMAC Pain Score and OHS as compared to aseptic revision THA. A similar proportion of patients were satisfied with their results of surgery in both groups (p=0.093). Conclusions: Although patients who underwent revision THA for PJI had poorer pre-operative functional scores (WOMAC function and SF-36 PF), at two years follow-up, these two groups of patients have comparable post-operative outcomes. Interestingly, patients who had revision THA for PJI reported a better clinical outcome in terms of OHS and WOMAC Pain score as compared to the aseptic group. We conclude that the revision THA for PJI is not inferior to aseptic revision THA in terms of patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes.

Research progress on periprosthetic joint infection after arthroplasty / 解放军医学杂志

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a catastrophic complication after artificial joint replacement, and its diagnosis and treatment has always been a great challenge in the field of orthopedics. At present, the treatment strategies for PJI include suppressive antibiotic therapy, debridement antibiotics irrigation of the retained, prosthesis, one-stage revision, two-stage revision, arthrodesis, amputation, and biotherapy, etc. Conventional treatment can not achieve satisfactory results. As a new treatment mode, biotherapy has unique advantages in PJI treatment. This article reviews the risk factors and the source of infection, diagnosis, classification and treatment strategies of PJI, in order to provide valuable reference for clinical treatment of PJI.

Debridement antibiotics irrigation and implant retention for the treatment of acute infection after total knee arthroplasty / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND: Compared with revision surgery, debridement antibiotics irrigation and implant retention for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection has the advantages of fewer traumas, shorter time, and lower cost. However, the indications and perioperative management are still controversial. OBJECTIVE: To review the application of preoperative indication, intraoperative operation and postoperative antibiotic application of debridement antibiotics irrigation and implant retention for the periprosthetic joint infection. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and The Cochrane Library database were retrieved from 2000 to 2018. The key words were “total knee arthroplasty, periprosthetic joint infection, diagnose, treatment”. Chinese literature was searched in the Wanfang database and CNKI from 2000 to 2018, and the keywords were “arthroplasty, postoperative infection, debridement antibiotics irrigation and implant retention”. Relevant literatures were screened, and the success rate of retained prosthesis in the treatment of infection after joint replacement was counted. The most accurate diagnostic criteria and the most effective treatment methods were summarized. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: At present, there is no unified international standard for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection after joint replacement. Many organizations have put forward some consensus and guidelines. Parvizi et al. proposed new diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection based on other consensus and guidelines, which is highly sensitive and specific, and has been accepted by most people. Debridement antibiotics irrigation and implant retention is suitable for patients with stable and well-fixed prosthesis, short symptom duration, good soft tissue, and no sinus tract formation. During the operation, the infected necrotic tissue and the suspected infected tissue should be thoroughly removed. The iodine-blood water should be soaked for half an hour; the new gasket should be replaced; and the sterilized towel should be replaced with a new set of surgical tools. According to the results of postoperative culture, sensitive antibiotics were combined and rifampin was taken orally out of hospital for 4 months. Debridement antibiotics irrigation and implant retention is the best method for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection, and has the advantages of less pain, less cost, high acceptance and avoiding revision.

Platelet count as a novel potential predictor of periprosthetic joint infection / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND: Obtaining synovial fluid for diagnostic test of periprosthetic joint infection is invasive and painful to patients. Platelet count is a regular blood test which has been used as a possible predictor of several infectious diseases. Presumably, it could be one of the indicators of periprosthetic joint infection. OBJECTIVE: To identify the accuracies of platelet combined with white blood cell, erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. METHODS: Patients undergoing revision arthroplasty from March 2013 to December 2018 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine were retrospectively enrolled. A diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection was confirmed in 77 patients according to the criterions from the Musculoskeletal Infection Society; the remaining 137 patients were confirmed as aseptic cases. White blood cell, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or C-reactive protein and platelet count were compared between the two groups. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The platelet values were significantly increased in periprosthetic joint infection cases. Sensitivity and specificity of the platelet for periprosthetic joint infection were 64.94% and 86.13%, respectively. Platelet demonstrated a higher accuracy when compared to erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein. In such cases, the platelet shows a certain reference value in confirming the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Platelet was enough used as adjunct diagnostic tool in patients suspected with periprosthetic joint infection.

Platelet count as a novel potential predictor of periprosthetic joint infection / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND: Obtaining synovial fluid for diagnostic test of periprosthetic joint infection is invasive and painful to patients. Platelet count is a regular blood test which has been used as a possible predictor of several infectious diseases. Presumably, it could be one of the indicators of periprosthetic joint infection. OBJECTIVE: To identify the accuracies of platelet combined with white blood cell, erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. METHODS: Patients undergoing revision arthroplasty from March 2013 to December 2018 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine were retrospectively enrolled. A diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection was confirmed in 77 patients according to the criterions from the Musculoskeletal Infection Society; the remaining 137 patients were confirmed as aseptic cases. White blood cell, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or C-reactive protein and platelet count were compared between the two groups. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The platelet values were significantly increased in periprosthetic joint infection cases. Sensitivity and specificity of the platelet for periprosthetic joint infection were 64.94％ and 86.13％, respectively. Platelet demonstrated a higher accuracy when compared to erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein. In such cases, the platelet shows a certain reference value in confirming the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Platelet was enough used as adjunct diagnostic tool in patients suspected with periprosthetic joint infection.

Daptomycin to bone and joint infections and prosthesis joint infections: a systematic review

ABSTRACT Backgroud: Daptomycin has been used in bone and joint infections (BJI) and prosthesis joint infections (PJI) considering spectrum of activity and biofilm penetration. However, the current experience is based on case reports, case series, cohorts, and international surveys. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate studies about daptomycin treatment efficacy in BJI/PJI compared to other antibiotic regimens. Methods: PubMed, LILACS, Scielo and Web of Science databases were searched for articles about daptomycin and treatment of BJI and PJI from inception to March 2018. Inclusion criteria were any published researches that included patients with BJI treated with daptomycin. Diagnosis of BJI was based on clinical, laboratory and radiological findings according to IDSA guidelines. Results: From 5107 articles, 12 articles were included. Only three studies described the outcomes of patients with BJI treated with daptomycin with comparator regimen (vancomycin, teicoplanin and oxacillin). Studies presented large heterogeneity regarding device related infections, surgical procedures, and daptomycin regimens (varied from 4 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg). A total of 299 patients have been included in all studies (184 infections associated with orthopedic disposal and 115 osteomyelitis/septic arthritis). Two hundred and thirty-three patients were treated with daptomycin. The clinical cure rates on device related and non-device related infections (i.e. osteomyelitis) were 70% and 78%, respectively. Compared to all regimens evaluated, daptomycin group outcomes were non-inferior. Conclusion: Although a randomized clinical trial is needed, this systematic review tends to support daptomycin usage for bone and joint infections.

Early Infection of Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty with Salmonella typhi: Case Report and Review of Literature

Acute Salmonella typhiprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare event. In Endemic areas one needs to be cautious if the patient is immunocompromised. We report a case of bilateral simultaneous PJI of the knee in a 60-year-old lady who was not immunocompromised. The patient presented on Post op Day 5 with Fever and local signs suggestive of infection. As this was an Early PJI she was successfully treated with Debridement, Poly exchange and Intravenous and oral antibiotics for 6 weeks. This case highlights the fact that in patients living in these areas and in seasons where incidence of enteric fever is high, patients should be screened preoperatively for Salmonella infection by history and stool cultures. To our knowledge this is the first case report of Early Bilateral Simultaneous infection with Salmonella typhi

Sonication of antibiotic loaded cement spacers: A valuable technique for detection of infection persistence in two-stage revision for infected joint arthroplasty

We evaluated the diagnostic utility of sonication of antibiotic loaded cement spacers comparing with periprosthetic tissue cultures for the detection of persisting infection in 14 patients undergoing staged procedures. Sonication improved microbial detection of intraoperative cultures from 14.2% to 28.5% (P = 0.481). Routine sonication of spacers is recommended.

Microbiological profile and outcomes of two-stage revision hip arthroplasty

Background: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most challenging cases that confront modern orthopaedics. Two-stage revision, which is the standard of care for PJI, is the preferred mode of treatment for these infections. Aims and Objectives: To study the microbiological profile of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) in the hip and to assess the efficacy of a two stage revision surgery for PJI. We also aimed to study the sensitivity and specificity of ESR and CRP in the diagnosis of PJI. Materials and Methods: The microbiological profile, clinical and radiological outcomes of 22 patients who had a two-stage revision for PJI of the hip between 2013 and 2017 were retrospectively analysed. PJI was defined using the criteria provided by the International Consensus Statement on PJI 2013. Results: Staphylococcus aureus was found to be the most common organism in PJI. Debridement was successful in removing the organism in 74% of PJI. At the time of re-implantation (second stage), six joints grew organisms that were different from that isolated at the index debridement - coagulase-negative staphylococci (3cases) and enterococci (3cases). Other infection parameters for these patients were negative. None of the patients who had two-stage revision surgery had clinical evidence of reinfection or radiological evidence of loosening at a mean of 2-year follow-up. An ESR cut off of >30mm/hr had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 88% in predicting PJI. A CRP >10mg/L had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 69%. The sensitivity and specificity of using both ESR and CRP cut-offs in the diagnosis of infection were 57% and 94%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 94% and negative predictive value was 56%. Conclusion: The outcomes of the study justify a two-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI of the hip. The use of ESR and CRP as screening tests for the success of debridement has value - but should be interpreted with caution.

Three Concurrent Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Case Report and Literature Review / 대한고관절학회지

Periprosthetic joint infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality following total joint arthroplasty. Two-stage arthroplasty, with the use of an antibiotic cement spacer, is an effective means of managing periperiprosthetic joint infections. There is a lack of data relating to the management, prognosis, and clinical outcomes associated with multiple peri-prosthetic joint infections. Here, we present a case report of a patient successfully treated for three synchronic peri-prosthetic joint infections of both knees and a single hip.

Efficacy evaluation of one-stage revision combined with intra-articular injection of antifungal agents in the treatment of chronic periprosthetic fungal infection / 中华外科杂志

Objective@#To investigate the clinical effect of one-stage revision combined with intra-articular injection of antifungal agents in the treatment of chronic periprosthetic fungal infection.@*Methods@#A retrospective analysis of 11 patients(4 hips, 7 knees) admitted with chronic periprosthetic fungal infection at Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2004 to April 2016.There were males and females with an age of 67 years (range:47-77 years). Each patient underwent single-stage revision including aggressive soft-tissue debridement. Liquid samples and tissue samples were immediately sent to the microbiology laboratory for drug sensitivity testing and histological analysis. Removed the infected components and cement thoroughly, pouring powdered vancomycin into the medullary cavity and direct intra-articular injection of fungussensitive antibiotics. The patients with infected hips received an uncemented prosthesis and 0.5 g of gentamicin loaded commercial cement was received by the patients with infected knee.After that, a new prosthesis was implanted.Long-term combination therapy of antibacterial agents and antifungal agents were given after operation. Recurrence of infection and clinical outcomes were evaluated. The follow-up period was 5 years (range: 2-12 years).@*Results@#One patient died of acute heart failure on the eighth postoperative day.Three infection cases were recurred.Eight cases had satisfactory outcomes and required no additional surgical or medical treatment for recurrence of infection. The Harris hip score assessed preoperatively and at latest follow-up was increased from 39.25±5.12 to 79.50±4.79, the difference was statistically significant (t=-11.356, P=0.001).The Hospital for Special Surgery knee score was improved from preoperative 46.25±5.61 to final follow-up 80.50±5.06, and the difference was statistically significant (t=-9.930, P=0.002).@*Conclusion@#Treatment of chronic fungal periprosthetic joint infection with single-stage revision can be fairly effective for achieving acceptable functional outcomes.

Present situation and prospect of diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections / 中华外科杂志

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) as an insurmountable challenge has always represented a serious concern for orthopedic surgeons. Accurate diagnosis and reasonable treatment of PJI are the keys to deal with this challenge.The diagnosis of PJI is mainly based on clinical manifestations, joint fluid biochemistry, pathogen culture and biomarkers at present. New pathogen culture methods and specific biomarkers in recent years are hot topics in PJI research. In terms of treatment, two-stage revision is still considered to be the 'gold standard’ protocol. However, more and more centers around the world have begun to accept and try one-stage revision as a treatment for PJI.